Archives: Conveyancing

This category can only be viewed by members.

HMLR – squatting

March 2025 | Conveyancing

HMLR has released details of a new resource aimed at the lay person, but it makes useful reading for practitioners as it covers ‘squatting and the law’, more familiarly described as ‘adverse possession.’ It covers: squatting in non-residential properties and relevant crimes that may have been committed; the rights that long-term squatters might have in …

This article is only available to subscribers.

Cladding remediation – timetable

March 2025 | Conveyancing

The fraught impact of the introduction of the Building Safety Act 2022 may have faded from the legal headlines, but the impact on affected properties and the wider property market will continue to be felt for some years. An important statistic is that seven years on from Grenfell, of the 4,834 buildings 11 metres and …

This article is only available to subscribers.

LFRA 2024 – judicial review

March 2025 | Conveyancing

The Leasehold Knowledge Partnership (LKP) reports on an issue which will not come as a surprise to many property lawyers: the judicial review proceedings in relation to the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024. They report that a number of freeholders were granted leave to apply for judicial review to challenge the threat to their …

This article is only available to subscribers.

EWS1 – concerns

March 2025 | Conveyancing

Property practitioners will be aware of the concerns relating to EWS1 certificates issued by Mr Adam Kiziak and his firm Tri Fire. The RICS reminds us that: ‘The EWS1 form is designed to be used for residential properties such as blocks of flats (including those owned by housing associations and social housing providers as well …

This article is only available to subscribers.

HMLR – PG8

March 2025 | Conveyancing

HMLR has updated PG8 (execution of deeds): ‘Section 2.7.2 has been amended to clarify that HM Land Registry will accept a certificate by the conveyancer acting for the limited partnership stating that a deed has been duly and properly executed in accordance with the partnership’s constitution.’ Source: www.gov.uk.

This article is only available to subscribers.

HMLR – PG16

March 2025 | Conveyancing

HMLR has updated PG16 (profits a prendre). Not a PG that practitioners will use every day, but important therefore to ensure that the correct forms are used. HMLR reminds us that: ‘A profit a prendre is a right to take something from another person’s land. This could be part of the land itself, such as …

This article is only available to subscribers.

HMLR – PG26

March 2025 | Conveyancing

HMLR has made a small but important change to PG26 (leases: determination). ‘Section 3 relating to determination on merger has been amended to clarify that an application must be made against all affected titles so that it is clear there is an intention to merge the estates.’ It is important for practitioners to ensure that …

This article is only available to subscribers.

HMLR – PG64

March 2025 | Conveyancing

HMLR has made a change to PG64 (prescribed clauses leases) as follows: ‘Section 5.5.2.1 relating to the completion of prescribed clause LR5.2 explains the importance of completing this clause when the provisions of any of the following Acts affect the way in which HM Land Registry must deal with the application: Leasehold Reform Act 1967, …

This article is only available to subscribers.

HMLR – PG27

March 2025 | Conveyancing

HMLR has made a change to PG27 (the leasehold reform legislation). If the impending changes to leasehold are introduced, practitioners must become familiar with PG27. The update is as follows: ‘In section 1 reference has been added to the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024. Sections 4.1 and 5.3 have been amended as a result …

This article is only available to subscribers.

Right to buy – case and changes

February 2025 | Conveyancing

The CA has recently heard a case involving right to buy succession. The appeal was referred to the CA by HH Judge Luba KC pursuant to CPR 52.23(a) after he gave permission to appeal. The important point of principle that the CA was asked to decide was whether a family member (B) of a secure …

This article is only available to subscribers.