The Practical Lawyer


Non-EU courts – parallel proceedings

There is considerable confusion as to whether the English Courts should stay proceedings (in England) when there are existing parallel proceedings in a non-EU country.

Under the Judgments Regulation, the basic rule is that a defendant domiciled in an EU member state must be sued in that country of domicile. Based on that rule, the ECJ held in Owusu [2005] that English courts had no jurisdiction to stay English proceedings if a defendant was domiciled in England – even if a non-EU jurisdiction (in that case, Jamaica) was clearly the more appropriate forum, and even though proceedings had not been commenced there.

Subscribers only...

EU judgments – freezing injunctions

The Brussels Regulations requires EU member states to recognise and enforce the judgments of other member states. The only exceptions are:

The problem is that those two exceptions can cause great difficulties when enforcing freezing injunctions. For instance, a company took action in Greece against a guarantor and obtained a worldwide freezing injunction in Greece, which was subsequently registered in England and Wales (where the defendant had some assets).

Subscribers only...

Mediation –non-attendance

A party who fails to attend mediation may be liable for the other side’swasted costs.

In a recent Technology & Construction Court case, the pre-action protocol had not been complied with because of limitation problems; accordingly, the court granted a stay, so that the protocol could be followed, with a date being set for mediation.

Subscribers only...

Service – by fax

New rules on the service of claim forms were introduced in October 2008. As far as service by fax is concerned:

the defendant, or his solicitors, must have confirmed in writing that he is willing to accept service by fax;

a fax number on notepaper can be sufficient indication that the defendant is willing to accept service by fax;

service must be on the defendant’s solicitor, if the defendant’s solicitor has notified the claimant in writing that he is instructed by his client to accept service.

Subscribers only...

Unless orders – strict approach

To further ‘the overriding objective’, the court has an inherent power to manage cases under CPR 3.1(2)(M). Taken with Parts 3.1(3) and 3.4(2) this means the court may make ‘unless orders’ which, if broken, may result in a statement of case being struck out. The criteria the court applies when deciding whether to grant relief from breach of an unless order will include:

the interests of the administration of justice;

whether the application for relief was made promptly;

whether the failure was intentional;

Subscribers only...

Claim form – service

What is the deadline for putting a claim form in the post (or DX, etc)? CPR 7.5(1) says it is ‘before 12 midnight on the calendar day four months after the date of issue of the claim form’.

Subscribers only...

Defendant – date of birth

The form of acknowledgment of service (revised Form N9) contains a box in which the defendant is asked to record his date of birth. What happens if the defendant does not do so?

Subscribers only...

Limitation – third-party debt orders

Section 24(1) Limitation Act 1980 says that no action can be brought on any judgment after the expiry of six years from the date on which the judgment became enforceable.

Subscribers only...

Costs – Mastercigars

We all know that if you give a costs estimate that proves to be wildly inaccurate, then you cannot expect to recover your full costs.

Subscribers only...

Estimates – inter partes effect?

The debate on whether costs estimates should be fully binding (or whether there should be a 20% uplift allowed) rumbles on, as noted in our previous entry on Mastercigars [2009].

Subscribers only...

Page 41 of 46

Most-read articles

Trustees – duty to beneficiaries
Wednesday, 11 July 2018
Trustees cannot simply ignore beneficiaries’ request for information about a trust, the High Court has held. In this case, the trust property was a farm outside Cardiff. Read more...
Conveyancing searches – disbursements?
Wednesday, 11 July 2018
Should electronic property searches be treated as disbursements for VAT purposes? Alternatively, are they part of the legal service provided, and so subject to VAT? Read more...
Professional – update
Wednesday, 11 July 2018
From December 2018 there will be new rules requiring firms to publish prices for conveyancing, probate, motoring offences and immigration, as well as the price for bringing ET claims.  Read more...
Service mistake – discretion?
Wednesday, 11 July 2018
To what extent do you have a duty to point out the other side’s procedural errors (as part of your obligation to comply with the ‘overriding objective’)? Read more...
Exiting the Portal – reasonable
Wednesday, 11 July 2018
Insurers should be very careful about making allegations (for instance, at Stage 2 of the EL/PL Protocol), especially if they could be interpreted as allegations of ‘dishonesty’. Read more...
Airbnb – breach of lease
Wednesday, 11 July 2018
It now seems clear that an Airbnb short let will be in breach of a typical long lease. Read more...
GDPR – data rooms
Wednesday, 11 July 2018
If L is planning to sell a property subject to leases, then almost certainly a data room will be set up containing all relevant documents. Read more...
Rights of way – public
Wednesday, 11 July 2018
There are four categories of public rights of way: Read more...
Financial remedies – company assets
Wednesday, 11 July 2018
A recent ruling illustrates when a court can treat a company-owned asset as as a matrimonial asset. Read more...
GDPR – references
Wednesday, 11 July 2018
GDPR impacts on the giving of references:


IAG International
MSI Global Alliance
Join the IBA now!
In House Lawyer