The Practical Lawyer

Home
About
CPD
Subscribe
Contact
Personal injury

Whiplash – bogus claims

Given the fuss about exaggerated whiplash claims, it is worth quoting the words of Martin J which he used in two recent appeals. In the first, the claimant had disclosed only one previous RTA (he had been involved in five), with Martin J therefore deciding this was ‘fundamental dishonesty’ (and so the claim was dismissed). In the second, the claimant failed to attend a series of physiotherapy sessions (which led to the claim being dismissed for a ’failure to prove’):

Subscribers only...
 

Fundamental dishonesty – exaggeration

The claimant was injured in an RTA, with the defendant admitting liability. The claimant alleged that he suffered from PTSD, and thus his loss of earnings claim was £850,000. The defendants said he merely suffered minor injuries which were resolved within six months. They therefore argued that he had ‘exaggerated’ his claim, and was therefore ‘fundamentally dishonest’ (so the claim should be struck out).

Subscribers only...
 

Damages – future accommodation

A claim for ‘future accommodation’ will typically be for the cost of alternative accommodation the claimant needs because of the injury suffered (eg specially modified accommodation). For the past three decades, awards for future accommodation have been calculated according to the methods set down in Roberts v Johnstone [1989], which were designed to compensate claimants for a notional loss of investment income on the capital used in buying a suitable property. However, as we noted in our June 2018 issue (p27) the logic of that approach has been under increasing attack in recent years. In particular, the arrival of the negative discount rate (in 2017) has simply made Roberts v Johnstone unworkable.

Subscribers only...
 

Part 36 – reminders

A reminder of some of the pitfalls of Part 36 offers:

Subscribers only...
 

Vicarious liability – independent contractor

Can an employer be liable for the acts of an independent contractor? That was the question posed in a series of claims against Barclays, with Barclays’ employees alleging that they had been sexually assaulted by a doctor who was carrying out medical examinations on the bank’s job applicants. The doctor had since died (before criminal convictions could be secured) and so the employees argued that Barclays was vicariously liable.

Subscribers only...
 

Limitation period – ‘fear’ claim?

What is the limitation period for bringing a claim based upon ‘fear’?

Subscribers only...
 

Standard costs – fixed or assessed?

The claimant and defendant settled a PI case by consent order with costs ‘on a standard basis, to be assessed if not agreed’.

Subscribers only...
 

Exiting the Portal – unreasonable

But, what about costs if the claimant unreasonably exits the Portal? For instance, suppose there is an unreasonable exit; the claimant starts Part 7 proceedings; and then he accepts a Part 36 offer.

Subscribers only...
 

Exiting the Portal – reasonable

Insurers should be very careful about making allegations (for instance, at Stage 2 of the EL/PL Protocol), especially if they could be interpreted as allegations of ‘dishonesty’.

Subscribers only...
 

‘Fundamental dishonesty’ – discontinuance?

Can a claimant avoid a finding of ‘fundamental dishonesty’ by serving a notice of discontinuance?

Subscribers only...
 


Page 3 of 48

Most-read articles

Probate fees – increase
Tuesday, 09 April 2019
The much-criticised increase in probate fees comes into effect in April 2019 and apply whether or not a solicitor is involved.  Read more...
SRA – Standards and Regulations introduced November 2019
Tuesday, 09 April 2019
We reported in our February 2019 edition (p32) and March 2019 edition (p33) that the SRA is phasing in its introduction of the new ’Standards and Regulations’ which will replace the 2011... Read more...
LiP – keep informed?
Tuesday, 09 April 2019
We do not usually report on changes which are not yet in force. However, litigators have been warned to expect changes to the processes relating to litigants in person which might come into effect on... Read more...
Interim costs order – when to exercise
Tuesday, 09 April 2019
The Gazette reports on an interesting County Court case where an interim costs order has been granted to solicitors where the full value of the claim will not be quantified until 2022. Read more...
Defective Premises Act – L liable
Tuesday, 09 April 2019
The CA has held that a social L was liable to a T for injury caused due to a faulty drain cover. Read more...
Service charges – recovery of more than 100%?
Tuesday, 09 April 2019
We reported in our February 2019 edition (p24) that the RICS Code of Practice Service Charges in Commercial Property (1st edition) comes into force on 1 April 2019. Read more...
Allotments – protection
Tuesday, 09 April 2019
With the increasing pressure to build new homes, there is a possibility that areas designated for allotments might be under threat of development. Read more...
Children – standard of proof
Tuesday, 09 April 2019
The Court of Appeal refused F’s appeal against the judge’s findings in care proceedings under Part IV CA 1989 that he had sexually abused his daughter (Y). Read more...
NDA – ignoring!
Tuesday, 09 April 2019
Recently, some employees have spoken publicly about sexual harassment in breach of NDA confidentiality obligations.  Read more...
Offences – assault; emergency workers
Tuesday, 09 April 2019
The Assaults on Emergency Workers (Offences) Act 2018 follows the increasing number of assaults on emergency workers in the UK.  Read more...

Resources

IAG International
www.totallylegal.com
Join the IBA now!
MSI Global Alliance
In House Lawyer