The Practical Lawyer

Landlord and tenant – commercial

Right to inspect – intrusive

A typical lease will allow L, on giving reasonable notice, ‘to enter upon premises generally to inspect and examine the same to view the state of repair and condition thereof’.

Subscribers only...

Insolvency – L’s remedies (1)

This table summarises L’s remedies when dealing with an insolvent individual (non-corporate) T.
Subscribers only...

Inspection – drilling bore holes

A typical lease will allow L to inspect the premises (on giving reasonable notice). But, does that right to inspect mean that L has the right to drill bore holes?

Subscribers only...

Renewal lease – planning breaches

A recent case is of interest because it shows that serious planning breaches by T may be sufficient grounds for refusing to grant T a new lease (under LTA 1954).

In this particular case, T had ignored a planning Enforcement Notice (and had been convicted in the magistrate’s court); he had also had a Breach of Condition notice served on him. As a result, the vast majority of the activities carried out by T on the premises had been unauthorised, and therefore illegal. In the court’s view, T’s ‘appalling past record of breaches of planning control’ and ‘unreliability as a witness’ meant it was unlikely that ‘if he was granted a renewal of his tenancy, he would continue to act lawfully’. Accordingly, L’s opposition to the new tenancy was upheld, with T’s planning breaches coming within the scope of ‘any other reason connected with T’s use or management of the holding’ (under s30(1)(c) LTA 1954). It is not clear from the report whether T’s use of the premises was in breach of the user clause in the lease; if it was, then one would assume that L would be taken to have waived those breaches by continuing to accept rent. But, subject to that point, the case does illustrate that planning breaches can be relevant on a 1954 Act renewal. ?Fowles v Heathrow Airport [2008] EWCA Civ 1270. Source: TLT Solicitors.


Rent – limitation periods

What are the limitation periods for claiming rent from a defaulting T? In practice, Ls are unlikely to allow rent to be unpaid for a long period of time, and a more relevant issue will be the length of the limitation period for enforcing any judgment obtained against that defaulting T.

Subscribers only...

Remedies – Third party

If T defaults, then L will consider what remedies there are against third parties, such as former Ts and guarantors. Particular points to bear in mind are:

Subscribers only...

Contracting out – ‘term of years certain’

Be aware of a major trap for L’s when drafting leases. The CA recently held that contracting out of LTA 1954 was not possible if a lease defines the term as a fixed period, together with ‘any period of holding over or extension, whether by statute or common law or by agreement’.

Subscribers only...

Corporate L – individual T

A new PD imposes a code of conduct for debt claims by corporate claimants against individual defendants. It will therefore apply to corporate Ls who are trying to recover debts from individual Ts or guarantors.

Subscribers only...

SDLT – holding over (3)

The rules on charging SDLT when T is holding over are complex, and depend upon whether the original lease was granted under the SDLT regime, or the earlier Stamp Duty regime.

Subscribers only...

SDLT – holding over (2)

Different SDLT rules apply when holding over a lease granted under the Stamp Duty regime (as opposed to one granted under the SDLT regime – see previous entry).

Suppose T was granted a lease in 1998 (on which Stamp Duty was paid), with the contractual term expiring in October 2008.

Subscribers only...

Page 52 of 54

Most-read articles

Probate fees – increase
Tuesday, 09 April 2019
The much-criticised increase in probate fees comes into effect in April 2019 and apply whether or not a solicitor is involved.  Read more...
SRA – Standards and Regulations introduced November 2019
Tuesday, 09 April 2019
We reported in our February 2019 edition (p32) and March 2019 edition (p33) that the SRA is phasing in its introduction of the new ’Standards and Regulations’ which will replace the 2011... Read more...
LiP – keep informed?
Tuesday, 09 April 2019
We do not usually report on changes which are not yet in force. However, litigators have been warned to expect changes to the processes relating to litigants in person which might come into effect on... Read more...
Interim costs order – when to exercise
Tuesday, 09 April 2019
The Gazette reports on an interesting County Court case where an interim costs order has been granted to solicitors where the full value of the claim will not be quantified until 2022. Read more...
Defective Premises Act – L liable
Tuesday, 09 April 2019
The CA has held that a social L was liable to a T for injury caused due to a faulty drain cover. Read more...
Service charges – recovery of more than 100%?
Tuesday, 09 April 2019
We reported in our February 2019 edition (p24) that the RICS Code of Practice Service Charges in Commercial Property (1st edition) comes into force on 1 April 2019. Read more...
Allotments – protection
Tuesday, 09 April 2019
With the increasing pressure to build new homes, there is a possibility that areas designated for allotments might be under threat of development. Read more...
Children – standard of proof
Tuesday, 09 April 2019
The Court of Appeal refused F’s appeal against the judge’s findings in care proceedings under Part IV CA 1989 that he had sexually abused his daughter (Y). Read more...
NDA – ignoring!
Tuesday, 09 April 2019
Recently, some employees have spoken publicly about sexual harassment in breach of NDA confidentiality obligations.  Read more...
Offences – assault; emergency workers
Tuesday, 09 April 2019
The Assaults on Emergency Workers (Offences) Act 2018 follows the increasing number of assaults on emergency workers in the UK.  Read more...


IAG International
Join the IBA now!
MSI Global Alliance
In House Lawyer