The Practical Lawyer


Trustees – duty to beneficiaries

Trustees cannot simply ignore beneficiaries’ request for information about a trust, the High Court has held. In this case, the trust property was a farm outside Cardiff.

It had been left by T under her will for the benefit of her six children (only two of whom are still alive) and their children.

The two surviving children, and one of their own children, are the trustees and beneficiaries – and three further grandchildren are also beneficiaries. These three (non-trustee) grandchildren believed distributions of trust money had been made to other trust beneficiaries but not to themselves as beneficiaries.

They therefore sought information from the trustees about their negotiations and dealings as to the potentially developable land, which was now worth around £10m. They also wanted to check that option agreements with potential buyers had been prudently entered into, and whether the land had been generating any income. At least one housing company was trying to buy it.

The beneficiaries sought disclosure of documents and other information from the trustees, on the basis of the trustees’ obligation to beneficiaries to account to them for their stewardship. The information they required was not forthcoming.

In the proceedings, there was a number of heads of claim relating to, for instance, the trustees’ distribution of income, breach of trust, and whether option agreements and the compulsory purchase arrangement were prudently entered into, and failures to take tax advice and act fairly and impartially.

The beneficiaries’ action succeeded. Matthews HHJ found that the claimants wanted the information for precisely the right reasons – to hold the trustees to account, and to vindicate their own beneficial interests – ‘by way of an action for breach of trust if need be’.

He was highly critical of the trustees, stating that they ‘have taken an extreme and in my judgement indefensible approach to disclosure in this case, first by denying (on a very weak basis) that the claimants were beneficiaries at all, and then by putting forward a series of hopeless arguments against giving information to the beneficiaries’. Furthermore, had they been less confrontational and more co-operative at the outset, this litigation could have been avoided.

It’s worth noting that the trustees had sought to rely on legal professional privilege for their communications with their lawyers. However, this stance was ‘wisely’ abandoned. As Matthews said: ‘where the advice is sought for the benefit of the Tamplin Trust as a whole, and the trustees pay for that advice out of Tamplin Trust funds, then such advice, even though it may be privileged as against third parties, is not privileged as against the beneficiaries…’. Lewis v Tamplin [2018] EWHC 777. Source:


Most-read articles

Trustees – duty to beneficiaries
Wednesday, 11 July 2018
Trustees cannot simply ignore beneficiaries’ request for information about a trust, the High Court has held. In this case, the trust property was a farm outside Cardiff. Read more...
Conveyancing searches – disbursements?
Wednesday, 11 July 2018
Should electronic property searches be treated as disbursements for VAT purposes? Alternatively, are they part of the legal service provided, and so subject to VAT? Read more...
Professional – update
Wednesday, 11 July 2018
From December 2018 there will be new rules requiring firms to publish prices for conveyancing, probate, motoring offences and immigration, as well as the price for bringing ET claims.  Read more...
Service mistake – discretion?
Wednesday, 11 July 2018
To what extent do you have a duty to point out the other side’s procedural errors (as part of your obligation to comply with the ‘overriding objective’)? Read more...
Exiting the Portal – reasonable
Wednesday, 11 July 2018
Insurers should be very careful about making allegations (for instance, at Stage 2 of the EL/PL Protocol), especially if they could be interpreted as allegations of ‘dishonesty’. Read more...
Airbnb – breach of lease
Wednesday, 11 July 2018
It now seems clear that an Airbnb short let will be in breach of a typical long lease. Read more...
GDPR – data rooms
Wednesday, 11 July 2018
If L is planning to sell a property subject to leases, then almost certainly a data room will be set up containing all relevant documents. Read more...
Rights of way – public
Wednesday, 11 July 2018
There are four categories of public rights of way: Read more...
Financial remedies – company assets
Wednesday, 11 July 2018
A recent ruling illustrates when a court can treat a company-owned asset as as a matrimonial asset. Read more...
GDPR – references
Wednesday, 11 July 2018
GDPR impacts on the giving of references:


IAG International
Join the IBA now!
MSI Global Alliance
In House Lawyer