The Practical Lawyer


Insolvency – TUPE

The TUPE Regs were changed in 2006 in respect of insolvent transfers, to make it easier to sell insolvent businesses as going concerns:

Subscribers only...

Insolvency – RPO

An employee who loses money because of an insolvent employer may be able to recover money from the RPO (Redundancy Payments Office). This covers:

Subscribers only...

Employment – on insolvency?

If a business becomes insolvent, the employees will want to know whether they will lose their jobs. The answer will usually depend upon the type of insolvency proceedings:

Subscribers only...

Self-employed – ‘worker’?

One of the key ingredients of any employment relationship is the need for there to be a personal obligation on the individual to carry out the work. If there is no such personal obligation then it is far more likely that the courts will find that it is a contract for services (ie self-employed, independent contractor).

Subscribers only...

Discrimination – teasing

The CA has held that homophobic banter can be ‘harassment’, even when the victim is known not to be gay. This was in the context of an employee who had been subject to sexual innuendo by four colleagues at work (based on the fact that he had been to a boarding school and that he lived in Brighton).

Subscribers only...

Insolvent business – TUPE?

Normally, if a business is transferred, then the buyer will assume obligations to previous employers’ staff. But, there is an exception on insolvency (when the transferring company is the subject of ‘bankruptcy proceedings or any analogous insolvency proceedings which have been instituted with a view to the liquidation of the assets of the transferor’).

Subscribers only...

Resignation – cooling off

If an employee resigns, it is generally a good idea to allow a cooling-off period. This is particularly so with ‘heat of the moment’ resignations, and one to two days has generally been regarded as an appropriate cooling-off period. But, if the decision to resign is a considered one (rather than done on an impulse) then no such period will be required.

Subscribers only...

Disciplinary hearing – lawyer?

An employee asked that he be allowed to attend a disciplinary hearing with his lawyer. The employer refused, pointing out that the contractual disciplinary policy expressly excluded a representative ‘acting in a legal capacity’. The employee argued that this was a breach of the implied term of trust and confidence, and also of his HRA 1998 rights. The court disagreed.

Subscribers only...

Grievance procedures – abolition

Employment Act 2008 abolishes the statutory dispute and grievance procedures as from 6 April. They are replaced by a new ACAS Code of Practice which will be taken into account by ETs when reviewing procedures. The key points are that:

Subscribers only...

Disability – non-disabled comparator

Last year it was held that when approaching claims of disability-related discrimination, you should compare the treatment of the disabled claimant with that of a non-disabled person who would otherwise be in the same circumstances.

Subscribers only...

Page 52 of 54

Most-read articles

Constructive trusts – property
Wednesday, 12 September 2018
The author gives a helpful analysis of a ruling following a claim to establish a constructive trust or proprietary estoppel in respect of a domestic property. The deceased died intestate while living... Read more...
Professional negligence – adjudication
Wednesday, 12 September 2018
The Professional Negligence Adjudication Scheme is run by the Professional Negligence Bar Association. It offers a voluntary ADR procedure, modelled on the adjudication system in construction... Read more...
Waste – L’s liability
Wednesday, 12 September 2018
Ls should be aware of the environmental enforcement obligations that may be incurred as a result of T’s activities. Read more...
Part 36 – late acceptance
Wednesday, 12 September 2018
If a Part 36 offer is accepted out of time (ie outside the 21 day period) in a low value protocol case, then what are the costs consequences? In particular, does late acceptance mean a liability to... Read more...
HMOs – new rules
Wednesday, 12 September 2018
The definition of house in multiple occupation (HMO) changes on 1 October 2018. The new definition covers properties occupied by five or more people, comprising two or more separate households. Read more...
Energy efficiency – reassessment by T?
Wednesday, 12 September 2018
The Energy Efficiency (MEES) Regs mean it is no longer possible to grant new leases to properties with an EPC of F or G. Moreover, existing lettings of F and G properties will become unlawful from... Read more...
Knotweed – nuisance
Wednesday, 12 September 2018
Last year, we had county court claims in Cardiff and Truro in which it was held that the encroachment of Japanese knotweed would be actionable as a ‘private nuisance’. The Cardiff cases have now... Read more...
Procedure – expert witnesses
Wednesday, 12 September 2018
Expert witnesses must comply with court rules and related guidance appropriate to their area of expertise. New guidance for paediatric expert witnesses in family proceedings has now been issued. Read more...
Self-employed – or worker?
Wednesday, 12 September 2018
The Pimlico Plumbers case was seen as a victory for workers in the gig economy, with the Supreme Court looking at the reality of the relationship (rather than the legal labels attached). So, what... Read more...
Offences – mens rea
Wednesday, 12 September 2018
This was a pre-trial appeal of a ruling at a preparatory hearing. The two appellants (A) faced charges under s17 Terrorism Act 2000 of sending money overseas, or arranging to do so, knowing or having... Read more...


IAG International
Join the IBA now!
In House Lawyer
MSI Global Alliance