The Practical Lawyer

Home
About
CPD
Subscribe
Contact
Conveyancing

LR – transfer fees

You cannot normally save money on transfer fees by putting more than one transfer in a single document. The fee is payable on the ‘transfer’ (ie the act of transferring), not the deed or form that effects the transfer. Thus, separate fees are required for what are really multiple dispositions. For instance:

Subscribers only...
 

SDLT – transitional rules

If a client is buying off plan, and so exchanging well before the completion date, then it is worth being aware of the traditional transitional rules where there is a change in SDLT. Broadly, if a contract has been entered into before a specific date then the buyer will pay the old (typically lower) SDLT rate, unless on or after that date there has been: 

Subscribers only...
 

Off-plan buyer – register a notice

What happens if an off-plan buyer exchanges contracts, pays a deposit, and then the developer goes bust?

Subscribers only...
 

Enquiries – non-reliance clause

The general rule is that you cannot rely on a ‘non-reliance’ clause if it turns out there has been a misrepresentation in the replies to enquiries.

Subscribers only...
 

Fraud – buyers’ solicitors liable!

Last month we noted the important – and worrying – case involving Mishcon de Reya, who acted for an innocent buyer in a conveyancing fraud (with the fraudster using false ID to sell someone else’s property). The seller’s solicitors admitted they had not carried out full ID checks, but it was the buyer’s solicitors who were held to be liable. They had not been negligent, and had acted both reasonably and honestly. But, since they were better placed to bear the loss (ie they were insured) they were held to be liable.

Subscribers only...
 

Enquiries – ‘not so far as we are aware’

It is not uncommon, especially with commercial pre-contract enquiries, for a seller to respond ‘not so far as we are aware’. But, such an answer should not be given as a lazy way of trying to avoid liability – there may be liability for misrepresentation if reasonable checks have not been taken to ensure that the reply is accurate.

Subscribers only...
 

Property fraud – seller’s solicitor

While the Mishcon de Reya case has created great uncertainty about the liability of a buyer’s solicitors when there is a property fraud, so another case has raised uncertainties about the liability of the seller’s solicitors.

Subscribers only...
 

Japanese knotweed – private nuisance

In an important case, a county court has held Network Rail liable after Japanese knotweed got into the foundations of homes adjoining railway land. The owners of the properties had been ‘trapped’ by knowledge of knotweed, and could not sell because banks and mortgagees would not grant mortgages on affected properties. After a four-day county court hearing, it was held that there was private nuisance, with Network Rail having to pay damages.

Subscribers only...
 

Fraud – who is insured?!

Frankly, it is difficult to know what to make of the latest High Court decision on conveyancing fraud. The facts were fairly typical, with a fraudster using false ID to sell someone else’s property. The seller’s solicitors admitted that they had not carried out full ID checks; despite that, however, it was the buyer’s solicitors who were held to be liable. They had not been negligent, and had acted both reasonably and honestly – but since they were better placed to bear the loss (ie they were insured) they were held to be liable. It does seem a nonsense approach.

Subscribers only...
 

Official searches – withdrawal

  It is now possible to withdraw an official search via the portal

Subscribers only...
 


Page 9 of 50

Most-read articles

Probate fees – increase
Tuesday, 09 April 2019
The much-criticised increase in probate fees comes into effect in April 2019 and apply whether or not a solicitor is involved.  Read more...
SRA – Standards and Regulations introduced November 2019
Tuesday, 09 April 2019
We reported in our February 2019 edition (p32) and March 2019 edition (p33) that the SRA is phasing in its introduction of the new ’Standards and Regulations’ which will replace the 2011... Read more...
LiP – keep informed?
Tuesday, 09 April 2019
We do not usually report on changes which are not yet in force. However, litigators have been warned to expect changes to the processes relating to litigants in person which might come into effect on... Read more...
Interim costs order – when to exercise
Tuesday, 09 April 2019
The Gazette reports on an interesting County Court case where an interim costs order has been granted to solicitors where the full value of the claim will not be quantified until 2022. Read more...
Defective Premises Act – L liable
Tuesday, 09 April 2019
The CA has held that a social L was liable to a T for injury caused due to a faulty drain cover. Read more...
Service charges – recovery of more than 100%?
Tuesday, 09 April 2019
We reported in our February 2019 edition (p24) that the RICS Code of Practice Service Charges in Commercial Property (1st edition) comes into force on 1 April 2019. Read more...
Allotments – protection
Tuesday, 09 April 2019
With the increasing pressure to build new homes, there is a possibility that areas designated for allotments might be under threat of development. Read more...
Children – standard of proof
Tuesday, 09 April 2019
The Court of Appeal refused F’s appeal against the judge’s findings in care proceedings under Part IV CA 1989 that he had sexually abused his daughter (Y). Read more...
NDA – ignoring!
Tuesday, 09 April 2019
Recently, some employees have spoken publicly about sexual harassment in breach of NDA confidentiality obligations.  Read more...
Offences – assault; emergency workers
Tuesday, 09 April 2019
The Assaults on Emergency Workers (Offences) Act 2018 follows the increasing number of assaults on emergency workers in the UK.  Read more...

Resources

IAG International
In House Lawyer
MSI Global Alliance
www.totallylegal.com
Join the IBA now!