The Practical Lawyer


Costs – challenge promptly

Litigation solicitors will no doubt breathe a sigh of relief to note that a costs judge has refused a claimant’s application to challenge a solicitor’s bill that was agreed and approved over four years ago. Carter-Ruck solicitors submitted a bill of £340,000 to their client in December 2014 for successful work in relation to a claim against a bank. The facts are complex but the central issue is that the bill of costs was fully itemised and was authorised by the claimant in relation to a conclusion from which he benefitted as the claimant received $500,000 in settlement of his claim and Carter-Ruck was separately paid its £340,000 in costs directly.
The costs judge was not persuaded that ‘family difficulties’ cited by the claimant were sufficient to justify a delay of some three years in challenging the amount received by Carter-Ruck and the judge took the view that the fact of him being a litigant in person had no bearing on the matter. Of particular note are the judge’s observations as follows:
  • the claimant was not forced into approving the settlement arrangements; 
  • Carter-Ruck were not threatening to cease to act (indeed, they indicated that they would continue to act even if the advice on settlement was not accepted);
  • the claimant could have gone to another firm if he had not wanted to accept the advice; and
  • the claimant did not understand that a detailed assessment is not a process of reducing the defendant’s bill of costs – it is aimed at establishing a reasonable chargeable figure (which may be substantially above the billed figure).
See Rattan v Carter-Ruck [2019] EWHC B9 (Costs) also reported on

Most-read articles

Inheritance claims – interim payments
Wednesday, 09 October 2019
When can the court exercise its statutory power to award interim payments to a claimant under the Inheritance Act? This issue rarely comes before the court and the author of this article highlights... Read more...
Refund entitlement – taxable amount not reduced
Wednesday, 09 October 2019
In their monthly VAT update, EY report on a case that will be interesting to lawyers as the facts involved an SDLT avoidance scheme (perhaps unsurprisingly, the four companies involved are in... Read more...
Costs – challenge promptly
Friday, 04 October 2019
Litigation solicitors will no doubt breathe a sigh of relief to note that a costs judge has refused a claimant’s application to challenge a solicitor’s bill that was agreed and approved over four... Read more...
Serving overseas – check the rules
Friday, 04 October 2019
 It might sound obvious, but if a firm is instructed to serve proceedings overseas, the firm must ensure that the rules of service in the relevant country are properly observed. The CA recently... Read more...
Pet rent – permissible
Friday, 04 October 2019
The excellent Pain Smith blog reminds us about the Tenant Fees Act 2019 (which we reported on in our previous editions – March 2019 (p27) and May 2019 (p28)). The Act outlaws letting fees paid by... Read more...
Brexit frustration – update
Friday, 04 October 2019
We reported in our April 2019 edition (p27) on the interesting case where the HC had to consider whether potential departure by the UK from the EU was sufficient to satisfy the legal meaning of... Read more...
Fixtures – what passes on sale of land?
Friday, 04 October 2019
Property lawyers will recall their land law, which states that fixtures can pass on the sale of land but fittings do not. This can be seen as an archaic distinction – but a recent HC case has... Read more...
Parents – gender
Thursday, 03 October 2019
 A definition of the term ‘mother’ has been established for the first time under English common law in a landmark case. At issue was: where a person born female who has undergone gender... Read more...
Drugs and alcohol – managing in the workplace
Thursday, 03 October 2019
An interesting article reminds employers to review their drugs and alcohol policies and breaches of them in the light of recent developments. Businesses are increasingly expected to support employees... Read more...
Terrorism – notice of detention
Thursday, 03 October 2019
A revised notice of detention which examining officers must provide to someone detained under Schedule 7 to the Terrorism Act 2000 has been published by the government. The notice gives information... Read more...


IAG International
In House Lawyer
MSI Global Alliance
Join the IBA now!